City vs. Suburbs – Let's Have Both!


Forgive me a post about ideas.

I feel so lucky to live and work in New York.

I tell just about anyone who will listen that this city is endlessly interesting.

A city of ideas, a city of energy.

Perhaps the “never sleeping” aspect is overblown, but even by pulling out a tidbit here or there – Hudson Yards, the renaissance of Brooklyn, bike culture, a resurgence of restaurant culture, you name it –

we are witnessing something special.
What we have in 2014, which has been percolating for the last 10 years

in new development and renovation,

could be called a New Gilded Age –

of city architecture, anyway.

Stopping just short of what

arrived in

the 1870’s by way of Vanderbilt’s kin and the scattering of stunning townhouses across Manhattan and beyond, much of what was designed 100+ years ago, along with

that era’s

conception of city living, is coming back around, less the abundance of servants.

Almost.

The Cast Iron House in Tribeca


Roughly one hundred years ago, architects began designing apartment buildings to attract townhouse dwellers and the newly minted rich.

Live-in help was part of the design – we still deal with “maid’s rooms” today, of course.

Any apartment larger than 6 rooms

had one or more.
During the second building boom

of the 40’s, 50’s and 60’s, the “servants as commonplace” notion began to fade, and a new conventional wisdom came into being.

City living meant smaller everything.

Fewer closets, smaller kitchens (even without The Help), lower ceilings.

Grand was gone, generally speaking, as were the maid’s rooms.
This wisdom would have it as follows: Don’t like the kitchens?

Go out to eat.

No one cooks anymore.

Baths too small?

Tough.

One sink, a crammed-in toilet and shower, poor ventilation.

Hate noise?

These sheetrock walls are going to be what they are.

Vertical living is what it is, buddy.
Have too many kids?

Move to the suburbs.

There, you could get

a large house in Westchester or New Jersey or Connecticut.

For many families who

wanted great public schools and big parks, leaving the city was the surest way of achieving

satisfaction.

Otherwise, city folk were prepared, to a large degree, to sacrifice.

It was Apartment Living.
Now,

a

new mentality has returned, focusing

on what existed so long ago in those original layouts.

Buyers desperately want the feeling of living in a home, rather than an apartment – to live in large rooms, with high ceilings, enjoying old concepts of gracious living and contemporary convenience, simultaneously.
It is a “let’s have both” time of wanting to bring suburban convenience into city living.

The push in this direction has been going on

for years of course, but it has been codified in the most recent batch of new development.

If we mentally delete all that technology has eliminated already – large TV’s, cd/dvd collections, books –

rooms and walls

are freed up.

We can focus on the space between the stuff.

The pendulum swings

back toward wood,

away from stark white, in kitchens too.

It swings back to pocket doors;

large, sumptuous closets; workmanship; custom quality delivered by developers.

Views and light continue to rule, but volume of space, proportion of rooms, and flow have taken root again.

All of this discussion informs my adventures

working with

buyers and sellers, looking at new development and which product captivates.

An article like this on 151 East 78th captures a bit of the zeitgeist.

The buyer pool speaks to this evolution.

Baby boomers moving back to the city.

Successful professionals who will live much longer, and

who have delayed marriage and parenthood past the point of thinking about moving to the suburbs (professionals in their 40’s are set in their ways – and will make a go of living permanently in New York City, if it’s possible).

Foreign investors who understand a level of luxury that for so long escaped city living here in Manhattan.

Each buyer group expects a higher level of service and will pay for it, from growing investment accounts or via mortgage rates.

The manifestation is clear, as buyers attempt to create these properties from former “cookie cutter” properties, combining and reimagining the low-ceilinged disasters built between 1961 and 1991.

Back-to-back kitchens combined, brokers discussing the “Costco Closet” created in the apartment for those trips to East 116th street. Many buyers are quite successful – meaning that they have made homes.


In my new development posts, I’ll cover 551 West 21st and the Cast Iron House. Both are gorgeous!

Recent Blog Posts

Deal of the Month: When the Third Time (or Agent) Is The Charm
(VIDEO) The Quarterly Report Is Old News
Deal of the Month: How to Know You’re Getting A Good Deal In the Moment—An Upper West Side Purchaser Story
(VIDEO) The One Thing You Need To Know About the Market (and ignore the rest)
My Experience with Fake Renters, aka Section 8 Ambulance Chasers
How Will The NAR Settlement (and its copycat lawsuits) Impact New York City’s Real Estate Market?
What The NAR Settlement Means For the Real Estate Industry
Apply To Be On The Pursuit Of Home Podcast
(VIDEO) What Are You Waiting For? The Manhattan & Brooklyn Aren’t Waiting For Spring to Bloom
The Silent Killer? Building Operation Costs. Here’s What Buildings—and NYC—Can Do About It.

Archives