The Value of Buy-Side Agents: Much More Than Zero


This oped was published on November 13, 2023 in at Off The Market. Link here.

We have been told that the three most important things in real estate are location, location, and location. But there are two other axioms which arguably supersede, one of which Burnett v National Association of Realtors (NAR), a federal class-action lawsuit of home buyers in Missouri, is presently testing in the courtroom. 

What is not under dispute is that sellers want to maximize their return on their home. To do so, many home sellers do, in fact, try to market their homes by themselves. However, according to the 2022 NAR data, more than 90% of all home sellers ultimately engage a Realtor to represent them.

The tactics of this association are currently under scrutiny when it comes to buyer representation, and how those tactics violate the other axiom: That every buyer wants to save money on their purchase.

Critics of NAR believe that it holds a de facto monopoly through its multiple listing service, and that were this “cartel” to be broken up, buyers could save more than $120 billion in fees per year. They argue that the sales commission commonly paid to a buy-side agent should remain in a buyer’s pocket. 

The facts say something quite different: Buyers affirmatively choose to hire Real Estate agents to represent them because of the value they add to each transaction. 

To the untrained eye, an agent might not appear necessary. After all, more than sixty million people per month visit Zillow.com, the most trafficked US Real Estate website. Despite the ample information freely available, 94% of buyers aged 25-44 still hire an agent to represent them. While that number drops to 80% for buyers over 55, recent consumer studies show that this number has only increased for both groups over the last two decades. 

Why would this be? Because nowhere does caveat emptor carry more weight than in a home purchase. First-time buyers comprise between 25-40% of annual home purchases. Those other home buyers have been out of the market for an average of nine years. Buyers have realized they are in over their head without the guideance of a real estate professional who can manage the morass of the transaction. But more than that, they have decided en masse to hire representatives who have a fiduciary responsibility to negotiate the best price, help them conduct due diligence, and put together a team of professionals to navigate the inevitable issues that arise. 

Buyer agents add value at every step of the transaction. It does not begin with the negotiation on price, either. In a low inventory environment, agents are relied upon as market makers. But often, they are only tour guides. According to NAR, the median gross income of its members was $54,330 in 2021, almost twenty-three percent lower than the median gross household income in the United States. 

The best agents earn more and deserve it. They are advocates, advisors, and people who care deeply about their clients, today, and long after the transaction is completed. To label them as unnecessary is an insult, not just to them, but to the buyers at all price points who decide to hire them.

Recent Blog Posts

Deal of the Month: When the Third Time (or Agent) Is The Charm
(VIDEO) The Quarterly Report Is Old News
Deal of the Month: How to Know You’re Getting A Good Deal In the Moment—An Upper West Side Purchaser Story
(VIDEO) The One Thing You Need To Know About the Market (and ignore the rest)
My Experience with Fake Renters, aka Section 8 Ambulance Chasers
How Will The NAR Settlement (and its copycat lawsuits) Impact New York City’s Real Estate Market?
What The NAR Settlement Means For the Real Estate Industry
Apply To Be On The Pursuit Of Home Podcast
(VIDEO) What Are You Waiting For? The Manhattan & Brooklyn Aren’t Waiting For Spring to Bloom
The Silent Killer? Building Operation Costs. Here’s What Buildings—and NYC—Can Do About It.

Archives